# Age verification for dating apps: methods and costs

Published 2026-10-16. Updated 2026-10-16. https://www.datingapi.io/insights/age-verification-dating-apps

**In short:** Dating apps need age checks that actually work. In the UK, Ofcom accepts seven kinds of method, including photo ID matching, facial age estimation and credit card checks, but not a date-of-birth box. Published prices run from about $0.10 for a selfie age estimate to $0.80 to $1.35 for a full ID and selfie check.

Age verification for dating apps has moved from a nice-to-have to a legal requirement in the UK, and it is heading the same way in parts of the US and the EU. Ofcom accepts seven kinds of method as capable of being "highly effective", from photo ID matching to facial age estimation, but not a date-of-birth box [1]. Where vendors publish prices, a selfie age estimate costs about $0.10 [6], and a full ID document and selfie check costs $0.80 to $1.35, before monthly minimums [4][5]. The bigger cost for most operators is not the check itself but the members who drop out during it.

This guide compares the methods, sets out what regulators accept and gives the published prices we could find as of 16 October 2026.

## Why dating apps need real age checks

In the UK, a dating app can only treat itself as closed to children if age verification or estimation stops them getting in. Otherwise it must follow Ofcom's children's safety codes. Our [Online Safety Act checklist](/insights/online-safety-act-dating-apps) covers that in detail. Ofcom also says any service that allows pornographic content, including in profiles or private messages, must use highly effective [age assurance](/glossary/age-assurance) [3].

The big UK apps moved before the July 2025 deadline. Feeld offered a phone number check or a selfie age estimate through Yoti, Tinder and Hinge used face scans, and Grindr matched a selfie video to photo ID [9].

## The methods compared

Ofcom asked 32 services, including four dating services, how they checked age in the second half of 2025 [2]. The table combines that data with what each method involves.

| Method | How it works | Ofcom says capable of being highly effective? | Share of Ofcom's sample offering it | Share of checks ending 18 or over |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Facial age estimation | Selfie analysed to estimate age | Yes | 91% | 58% |
| Photo ID matching | ID document scanned and matched to a live selfie | Yes | 84% | 73% |
| Digital identity services | Reusable ID app or wallet shares an "over 18" attribute | Yes | 38% | 51% |
| Credit card check | Checks the member holds a valid credit card | Yes | 34% | 40% |
| Email-based age estimation | Email address checked against data on where it has been used | Yes | 22% | 56% |
| Mobile network operator check | Operator confirms whether the number has an age restriction | Yes | 9% | 44% |
| Open banking | Member logs into their bank to confirm age | Yes | Not clear in Ofcom's data | 96% |
| Self-declaration | Member types a date of birth | No | Not counted | Not counted |

Source: Ofcom [1][2]. Ofcom's sample is not representative, and it warns the last column "is not a direct indicator of effectiveness" because it also reflects who tries each method and how easy it is [2].

Two things stand out. Facial age estimation and photo ID matching dominate, offered by 91% and 84% of the services Ofcom looked at, because both run inside a phone's camera flow [2]. And the low completion rates for card and mobile operator checks suggest they lose more people along the way, though Ofcom is careful not to draw firm conclusions [2].

Ofcom requires methods to be "technically accurate, robust, reliable and fair", and has not set a numeric accuracy threshold [1]. In practice its July 2026 report pushed dating services towards two extra controls: a challenge age (for example, sending anyone estimated under 25 to a stronger check) and liveness detection to stop photos and deepfakes [2].

## What it costs

Most age assurance vendors quote prices privately. These are the published list prices we found on 16 October 2026.

| Vendor and plan | What is included | Price per check | Monthly minimum |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Didit age estimation | Selfie age estimate | $0.10 | None on free tier |
| Didit ID check | Document check, with passive liveness $0.10 and face match $0.05 extra | $0.15 | None on free tier |
| Veriff Essential | ID document, selfie, liveness | $0.80 | $49 |
| Veriff Plus | As above, hybrid automated and human review | $1.39 | $99 |
| Sumsub Basic | ID document, liveness and face match | $1.35 | $149 |

Source: vendor pricing pages [4][5][6]. Didit's free tier includes 500 full verifications a month [6]. Enterprise prices are not published.

To put that in context, here is our own calculation for 10,000 new sign-ups a month, using list prices only:

- **Selfie age estimate for everyone:** 10,000 × $0.10 = $1,000 [6].
- **Full ID and selfie check for everyone:** 10,000 × $0.80 = $8,000 on Veriff Essential, or 10,000 × $1.35 = $13,500 on Sumsub Basic [4][5].
- **Layered approach:** if 80% clear a selfie estimate and the other 20% go on to a full ID check, the cost is (10,000 × $0.10) + (2,000 × $0.80) = $2,600 using Didit and Veriff list prices, where the 80% is our assumption for illustration, not a benchmark [4][6].

Ofcom's overall view, after a year of checks, is that "the direct costs of age assurance are not prohibitively high" [2].

## The conversion trade-off

The real cost is the members who give up. Every extra step at sign-up loses some genuine adults, and stronger methods tend to lose more. Ofcom found that one adult service removed a digital identity option after a week because the flow was too long and people abandoned it [2].

There is also an upside that is easier to measure than drop-off. Match Group says that after Tinder made Face Check, a video selfie matched to profile photos, mandatory for new members in some markets, exposure to potential bad actors fell by over 60% and reports of bad actors by over 40% [12]. Face Check is a liveness and photo match rather than an age check, but it shows the same flow can do both jobs.

Practical ways to limit the drop-off:

- start with the lowest-friction method, usually a selfie estimate, and only escalate when the result is close to 18 or risk signals appear
- offer at least two methods, so people without a passport or a credit card can still join
- explain why you are asking, in one line, before the camera opens
- reuse the same selfie for profile photo verification, so members see one step, not two

## US and EU rules

**United States.** There is no federal age verification law for dating apps. In June 2025 the Supreme Court upheld Texas's age verification law for sexually explicit websites by six votes to three, applying intermediate scrutiny [8]. More relevant to dating apps are the new app store laws. Texas's App Store Accountability Act took effect on 1 January 2026 and Utah's developer duties on 6 May 2026 [10]. Under these laws developers must request age and parental consent data from the app store and use it to apply protections [10]. The Texas law was blocked in December 2025, but after the Fifth Circuit stayed that injunction on 1 June 2026, Apple began enforcing it for new Texas accounts from 4 June 2026 [11]. California's Digital Age Assurance Act follows on 1 January 2027, with fines of up to $7,500 for wilful violations [10]. See our guide to [App Store and Google Play rules](/insights/app-store-rules-dating-apps) for the developer side.

**European Union.** In July 2025 the European Commission published guidelines on protecting minors under the Digital Services Act. They recommend age verification for adult content platforms and other high-risk services, using methods that are "accurate, reliable, robust, non-intrusive and non-discriminatory" [7]. The Commission is piloting an age verification app with Denmark, Greece, Spain, France and Italy, built to the same specifications as the EU Digital Identity Wallets due before the end of 2026 [7]. For dating operators, that points to digital ID becoming a cheaper, lower-friction option in Europe over the next two years.

## What it means for dating app operators

- **Pick from Ofcom's list, then add liveness and a challenge age.** That is what Ofcom is now asking dating services to do [1][2].
- **Budget per sign-up, not per member.** At list prices, a layered approach can cost a fraction of a full ID check for everyone, as our calculation shows [4][6].
- **Measure drop-off by method.** Ofcom's data shows big differences in completion between methods [2]. Track your own and remove options that lose genuine adults.
- **Plan for app store age signals.** Texas and Utah have already shifted part of the job to Apple and Google, and California follows in 2027 [10][11].

If you want age checks and photo verification built into one sign-up flow, see [how a Dating API build works](/how-it-works).

## Questions

**Which age verification methods does Ofcom accept?**

Ofcom lists open banking, photo ID matching, facial age estimation, mobile network operator checks, credit card checks, digital identity services and email-based age estimation as capable of being highly effective [1]. Self-declaration is not [1].

**How much does age verification cost per check?**

Where vendors publish prices, a selfie age estimate costs about $0.10 [6], and a full ID document and selfie check costs $0.80 to $1.35, with monthly minimums [4][5].

**Do US dating apps have to verify age?**

There is no federal rule for dating apps. Texas and Utah now require app stores to verify age and pass age signals to developers, and Apple began enforcing the Texas rules for new accounts on 4 June 2026 [10][11].

**Does the EU require age verification for dating apps?**

The European Commission's July 2025 guidelines under the Digital Services Act recommend age verification for adult content platforms and other services that pose high risks to minors, and it is piloting an age verification app with five countries [7].

## Sources

1. Age checks to protect children online, Ofcom, 2025-01-16. https://ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/age-checks-to-protect-children-online
2. Report on the use of age assurance, Ofcom, 2026-07-15. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/online-safety/information-for-industry/age-assurance-report-2026/report-on-the-use-of-age-assurance.pdf
3. Dating and social discovery: know the online safety risks, rules and how to comply, Ofcom, 2026-05-18. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/dating-and-social-discovery-know-the-online-safety-risks-rules-and-how-to-comply
4. Pricing and plans, Veriff, 2026-10-16. https://www.veriff.com/pricing
5. Pricing and plans, Sumsub, 2026-10-16. https://sumsub.com/pricing/
6. Pricing, Didit, 2026-10-16. https://didit.me/pricing
7. Commission presents guidelines and age verification app prototype for a safer online space for children, European Commission, 2025-07-14. https://cyprus.representation.ec.europa.eu/news/joint-press-release-commission-presents-guidelines-and-age-verification-app-prototype-safer-online-2025-07-14_en
8. Supreme Court decides Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, Faegre Drinker, 2025-06-27. https://www.faegredrinker.com/en/insights/publications/2025/6/supreme-court-decides-free-speech-coalition-inc-v-paxton
9. UK dating apps adopt age verification ahead of Online Safety law, Global Dating Insights, 2025-07-24. https://www.globaldatinginsights.com/featured/uk-dating-apps-adopt-age-verification-ahead-of-online-safety-law/
10. Age verification laws: what app developers need to know, McNees Wallace & Nurick, 2025-11-19. https://www.mcneeslaw.com/age-verification-laws-app-developers-compliance/
11. Age verification now mandatory for App Store users in Texas, AppleInsider, 2026-06-03. https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/06/03/age-verification-now-mandatory-for-app-store-users-in-texas
12. Tinder to expand facial verification feature across the U.S., setting a new standard for dating safety, Match Group, 2025-10-22. https://mtch.com/?p=3758